|
|
|
Volume
4, No.2
|
October
2000
|
|
| |
|
|
Desiderio Rodrigues
Rewati Raman Sharma
Jesus Sousa
Sanjay J Pawar
Ashok K Mahapatra
Santosh Dinkar Lad
|
National
Neurosurgical Center
Khoula Hospital
Sultanate of Oman
|
Correspondence:
Dr. Rewati R Sharma
PO Box 397
Al Harthy Complex
Qurum, Muscat 118
Sultanate of Oman
Tel/Fax: (968) 567 339
E-mail: rrsharma@omantel.net.om
|
|
|
Post-Traumatic
Hydrocephalus in Severe Head Injury Series of 22 Cases
Post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) is a relatively rare, but
well recognised clinical entity. Only a few series are reported
in the world wide literature, mainly as case reports.(2,9,10,12,13)
Although, the dilatation of the ventricles after head injury
is common due to post-traumatic cerebral atrophy (hydrocephalus
en vacuo) which is well differentiated from PTH. In PTH due
to subarachnoid and intraventricular blockage, the dilated ventricles
cause raised intracranial pressure, which has to be relieved
at the earliest to prevent further brain damage.(2) Authors
report an analysis of a series of 22 cases of PTH seen among
891 severe head injury patients admitted in the Neuro-intensive
care unit (NICU), Khoula Hospital, Oman, over a period of 2
years with an incidence of 2.4%. Traumatic intraventricular
haemorrhage (IVH) was found to be the aetiology in 54.54% of
the patients. All patients required neurosurgical intervention
at some point of time during their admission, with 45.45% of
the 22 patients showing a good outcome at the time of discharge.
No long-term significant improvement has been noted in 55% of
the patients.
Keywords: Post-traumatic hydrocephalus, head injury,
dilatation of ventricles, CSF drainage and shunting. |
|
|
|
|
Post traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) is a relatively rare
condition.(2,9,10, 12,13) Only a few series have been reported in the
English literature,mainly in the form of case reports.(2,9,10,12,13) Dilatation
of the ventricles with normal intracranial pressure after severe head
injury is common due to loss of brain volume (hydrocephalus en vacuo)
and is inconsequential in the long run. On the other hand, PTH is a distinct
entity where ventricular dilatation is associated with raised intracranial
pressure that needs to be relieved to prevent further intracranial pressure
effects.(2) Authors report an analysis of severe head injury patients
admitted in the Neuro-intensive care unit (NICU) over a period of two
years to determine the incidence, causative factors, clinical course and
outcome of PTH in these patients.
The case records of 891 patients with severe head injury, who were admitted
at the National Neurosurgical Centre at Khoula Hospital, Oman between
March 1998 to March 2000, were retrospectively analysed. Records were
scrutinised to analyse the type of injury, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) at
admission, CT scan findings, clinical course, onset of PTH, the neurosurgical
modalities employed and the outcome. The out-patient records were also
evaluated for the long term follow-up results.
Among
the 891 patients admitted with severe head injury, 22 patients developed
PTH, thus giving an incidence of 2.4%. While 4 patients were less than
15 years old, 13 patients (59.09%) were in the age group of 15-40 years
and 5 patients were more than 40 years of age. All the patients were involved
in high speed road traffic accidents. There were 20 males and 2 females.
These patients were admitted with a GCS of 8 or less. They were all electively
paralysed, intubated and ventilated at admission. The pupillary responses
were normal and the vital signs were stable in the normal range.
The initial CT scans showed intraventricular haemorrhage in 12 patients
(54.54%); diffuse contusions in 2 cases (9.09%), traumatic SAH in 4 cases
(18.8%), and significant localised intracranial haematomas in 4 cases
(18.8%). Among the latter group two of the patients with thin subdural
haematomas were treated conservatively, and only 2 patients with extra
dural haematomas underwent surgery. Usually patients were weaned off the
ventilator between the 3rd to 9th post-trauma day.
While PTH in 21 of our 22 patients developed between the 3rd to 8th week,
in one case it presented on the 10th post-trauma day. Patients commonly
presented with deterioration in the level of consciousness, or failure
to maintain progressive clinical improvement. The repeat CT scan done
in these patients confirmed the diagnosis of post-traumatic hydrocephalus.
Diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP) was done in these patients as per the
protocol, which revealed an initial pressure of more than 180 cms of H2O
in all 22 patients. Among these 22 patients, 9 (40.9%) underwent medium
pressure Codman Medos ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunts as a primary procedure,
4 patients underwent VP shunt after an initial external ventricular drain
(EVD) insertion to clear the blood stained CSF. Five patients with intraventricular
haemorrhage had an initial Omayya reservoir inserted followed by a medium
pressure VP shunt insertion. Among the 4 patients with traumatic subarachnoid
haemorrhage, 2 of the patients underwent repeated LP's and improved; one
had a thecoperitoneal shunt performed and one patient did not improve
after repeated LP and the relatives refused further treatment.
Of the 22 patients, 10 patients (45.45%) showed a good clinical improvement,
4 patients showed a moderate to minimal improvement. Seven patients (31.81%)
showed no improvement and one patient died due to ventriculitis.
PTH although relatively rare, is a treatable condition. While the incidence
of PTH is not well documented some series report an incidence of between
2-8%.(2,7,9,10,12,13) One in twenty patients with severe head injury
may develop significant post-traumatic hydrocephalus. In some patients,
the initial brain damage may preclude significant improvement. Most
of these cases may be due to cerebral atrophy with secondary ventriculomegaly.
If only CT findings of ventriculomegaly are taken into account, then
an incidence of 30-86% has been reported. Hence, it is important to
distinguish between PTH and cerebral atrophy as the latter usually do
not respond to neurosurgical procedures.(2,9)
PTH may present with various clinical syndromes including obtundation,
failure to improve and a tetrad of symptoms including psychomotor retardation,
memory loss, gait ataxia and incontinence.(1,15) Sometimes, the patient
may be too injured to demonstrate clinical signs and symptoms of PTH,
or may present with atypical symptoms.(1) According to Groswasser, et
al when a patient is in a state of prolonged coma or when there is an
arrest in the clinical progress in conscious cranio-cerebral injured
patients, communicating hydrocephalus should be suspected.(7)
PTH is thought to arise from the blockage of the cerebrospinal fluid
(CSF) flow around the cerebral convexities.1 SAH leads to communicating
hydrocephalus due to block in the subarachnoid pathways or even subarachnoid
granulation, either as an acute obstruction or as a late effect. Posterior
fossa contusions and blood in the 4th ventricles may also manifest as
acute obstructive hydrocephalus.(5,6) Rarely, some patients may present
with hydrocephalus following a craniotomy since decompressive craniotomy
is thought to lead to blockage around the cerebral convexities.(13)
PTH is rare among children and has mainly been published as case reports,
except neonatal hydrocephalus secondary to birth trauma and IVH.(1,4)
In view of its association with neurodevelopmental disability, PTH in
infants is a very serious condition.4 Hydrocephalus in these children
may induce further parenchymal injury due to high pressure. This ventricular
enlargement if not treated in time means the cerebral damage may not
be reversible by CSF diversion procedures.(4)
While PTH commonly occurs in the 1st year post- trauma, it has been
occasionally described as early as within 7 hours post-trauma.(2,16)
In our series one patient was diagnosed on the 10th post-trauma day
and 21 patients between the 3rd to 8th week following severe head injury.
Clinical and radiological correlation remain the cornerstone for the
diagnosis of PTH. Serial CT scans are the investigative modality of
choice in these patients. Other modalities of investigation, advised
by various authors, include overnight intracranial pressure recording,
lumboventricular infusion testing, cisternography mainly to differentiate
PTH from hydrocephalus en vacuo, although there is still considerable
uncertainty about shunt prediction ability.(1) However, on lumbar computerised
infusion test, a pattern of CSF circulation with low or normal resistance
to the CSF outflow, increased brain compliance with very few vasogenic
waves is characteristic of cerebral atrophy.(3) Beryel, et al have opined
that when the lumbar CSF pressure is above 180 cms of water, PTH should
be treated with a shunt unless a contraindication to the surgery exists.(1)
Gudeman, et al have reported that, radionucleide cisternography provided
an additional means of determining those patients whose recovery was
impaired by PTH and might therefore improve with shunting.(8)
Enlargement of the lateral ventricles as defined by the ventricle –
brain ratio can be demonstrated in up to 72% of head injured patients.(11)
Although Kishore, et al in their study had demonstrated a significant
correlation between the ventricular size and the outcome, PTH was seen
in only 13.7% of their patients with ventriculomegally.(10) Levin, et
al in their study have also showed that dilatation of ventricles is
directly related to the duration of the coma, and subsequent memory
and intellectual deficits.(11)
Increased periventricular lucency, obliteration of cerebral cortical
sulci, and enlargement of the temporal horns together with internal
hydrocephalus on a CT scan indicate an active process and favours CSF
shunting.(14)
Most series have demonstrated good recovery rates between 45-50% in
patients with PTH following CSF shunting.(2,12) In our series 45% of
the patients showed a good recovery and 18.8% showed moderate to minimal
recovery following neurosurgical intervention.
|
| Table
1 - Total head injury admissions between March 1998 - March
2000 |
|
Total Admissions (GCS)
|
No. of cases
|
Incidence of PTH
|
|
Mild head injury (13-15)
|
2231
|
0%
|
|
Moderate head injury (9-12)
|
1325
|
0%
|
|
Severe head injury (8 or below)
|
891
|
2.4% (22 cases)
|
| Table
2 - CT scan findings |
|
CT scan
findings
|
Incidence
|
|
Traumatic
intraventricular haemorrhage
|
12 (54.54%)
|
|
Traumatic
subarachnoid haemorrhage
|
4 (18.8%)
|
|
Diffuse
contusions
|
2 (9.09%)
|
|
Localised
intracranial haematomas
|
4 (18.8%)
|
| Table
3 - Outcome following
neurosurgical intervention |
|
Neurosurgical intervention
|
No. of cases
|
Outcome
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
External ventricular drain followed
by VP shunt
|
4
|
2 - good improvement
1 - no improvement
1 - died due to ventriculitis
|
|
Omayya reservoir for drainage followed
by VP shunt
|
5
|
1 - good improvement
1 - minimal improvement
3 - no improvement
|
|
Thecoperitoneal shunt
|
1
|
1 - good improvement
|
|
Repeat lumbar puncture
|
3
|
2 - moderate improvement
1 - no improvement
|
|
On analysis of the head injured patients admitted in the National Neurosurgical
Centre at Khoula Hospital between March 1998 to March 2000, the following
conclusions may be drawn as regards to PTH. PTH is certainly rare in
mild or moderate head injury as we had no such case among 3556 cases
admitted during the present study. Twenty-two of the 891 cases of severe
head injury admitted developed PTH (incidence of 2.4%). Traumatic intraventricular
haemorrhage and/or SAH were the commonest risk factors as seen on initial
CT scans. PTH commonly developed between the 3rd to 8th week when the
patents were convalescing on the wards. Clinical and radiological monitoring
is of paramount importance especially in patients with a high risk factor.
Two-thirds of the PTH patients showed clinical improvement after neurosurgical
intervention. However, neurosurgical interventions are not without risks,
as one of the patients in our series died of ventriculitis.
|
| 1. |
Beyerl B, Black PM: Post traumatic
hydrocephalus. Neurosurg 1984,15: 257-261 |
| 2. |
Cardoso ER, Galbraith S: Post traumatic
hydrocephalus, a retrospective review. Surg Neurol 1985, 23: 261-264 |
| 3. |
Czosnyka M, Copeman J, Czosnyka Z,
McConnell R, Dickson C, Pickard JD: Post traumatic hydrocephalus
– influence of craniectomy on the CSF circulation. J Neuro Neurol
Psych 2000, 68: 216-218 |
| 4. |
Du Plessis AJ: Post hemorrhagic hydrocephalus
and brain injury in the preterm infant: dilemma in diagnosis and
management. Seminar in Ped Neurol 1998, 5: 161-179 |
| 5. |
Fleisher AS, Huhn SL, Meislen H: Post
traumatic acute obstructive hydrocephalus. Ann Emerg Med 1988, 17:
165-167 |
| 6. |
Grcevic N: Traumatic tears of the
tela choroidea as an unrecognized cause of post traumatic hydrocephalus.
Acta Neurochir (Suppl) Wien 1983, 32: 79-85. |
| 7. |
Groswasser Z, Cohen M, Reider-Groswasser
I, Stern MJ: Incidence, CT findings and rehabilitation outcome of
patient with communicative hydrocephalus following severe head injury.
Brain Injury 1988, 2: 267-272 |
| 8. |
Gudeman SK, Kishore PR, Becker DP,
Lipper MH, Giravendulis AK, Jeffries BF, Butterworth JP IVth: Computed
tomography in the evaluation of incidence and significance of post
traumatic hydrocephalus. Radiol 1981, 141: 397-402 |
| 9. |
Guyot LL, Micheal DD: Post traumatic
hydrocephalus, Neurol Res 2000, 22: 25-28 |
| 10. |
Kishore PR, Lipper MH, Miller JD, Giravendulis
AK, Becker DP, Vines FS: Post traumatic hydrocephalus in patients
with severe head injury. Neuro Radiol 1978, 16: 261-265 |
| 11. |
Levin HS, Meyers CA, Grossmann RG,
Sarwa M: Ventricular enlargement after closed head injury. Arch
Neurol 1981, 38: 623-629 |
| 12. |
Paoletti P, Pezzotta S, Spanu G: Diagnosis
and treatment of post traumatic hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Sci 1983,
27: 171-175 |
| 13. |
Pheupathow N, Ratanalert S, Saeheng
S, Sripanojkul B: Post traumatic hydrocephalus, experience in 17
consecutive cases. J Med Assoc Thai 1999, 82: 46-53 |
| 14. |
Slosarek J, Kacjor R, Niezanbitowski
K, Kojder I: Diagnosis of progressive open internal hydrocephalus
in patients after craniocerebral injuries and subarachanoid hemorrhage.
Pol Tyg Lek 1992, 47: 312-313 |
| 15. |
Spanu G, Knerich R, Messina AL, Karussos
G: Post traumatic hydrocephalus. Riv Neurol 1985, 55: 185-196 |
| 16. |
Takagi H, Tanaka Y, Moru S, Okwada
T: Rapid enlargement of the ventricles after a head injury. Surg
Neurol 1981, 16: 103-105 |
|
|
|