Review Article
Volume 4, No.2
October 2000
 Marwan I Hariz
 Department of Clinical  Neurosciences University  Hospital of Northern Sweden  Umea
 Sweden
 Correspondence:
 Dr. Marwan I Hariz
 Department of Clinical  Neurosciences University Hospital of  Northern Sweden
 S-901 85 Umeå
 Sweden
 Tel: (46) 90 785 0000
 Fax: (46) 90 122 448
 E-mail:marwan.hariz@neuro.umu.se
  Pros and Cons of Various Stereotactic Procedures for Parkinston's Diesease

   ABSTACT
Surgery for Parkinson’s disease is experiencing a true renaissance that started some decade ago Several surgical procedures targeting various nuclei and pathways in the basal ganglia and thalamus have been developed. This article reviews the currently used ablative and deep brain stimulation procedures, focussing on their indications and symptomatic impact profile, as well as on their advantages and disadvantages.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, stereotactic surgery, pallidotomy, thalamotomy, deep brain stimulation and subthalamic nucleus.
   INTRODUCTION
The aim of stereotactic surgery for Parkinson’s disease (PD) is to alleviate the symptoms of the patient, not to cure the disease. The various surgical procedures have different impact on the different symptoms of the patient. In the last decade there has been a worldwide spread of stereotactic surgery for PD.(4,9). Posteroventral pallidotomy and deep brain stimulation (DBS) in various basal ganglia targets have been the most used surgical procedures. (3,10,12). In this article, the author’s opinion on the indications, impact profile and side effects of the various surgical procedures will be presented.


Eligibility for PD Surgery

Eligible for surgery are patients with incomplete effect of medications on their symptoms and disability and/or patients presenting side effects due to medication, such as dyskinesias. In general, the sooner the surgery the better outcome for the patient. High age, although not in itself a contraindication for operation may increase the risks. Besides, the “old” patient’s ability for regaining independency after successful surgery is not as good as that of the “younger” patient. Surgery is contraindicated in the following conditions:

1. Patients regularly taking anticoagulation drugs or who have blood coagulation deficiency
2. Severely hypertensive patients with uncontrolled blood pressure
3. Patients with cognitive decline (clinically relevant short-term memory deficit or dementia)

Pallidotomy and Pallidal DBS
Pathophysiological background: Dopamine deficiency in the putamen provokes through a GABAergic direct pathway to the globus pallidus internum (GPI) and a glutaminergic pathway from the subthalamic nucleus (STN), an over activity of the inhibitory GPI, acting on the thalamo-cortical circuitry, which provokes an inhibition of movement time and inhibition of initiation of movements. This inhibition may account for the development of akinesia, rigidity and tremor in PD. The dyskinesia seen in PD patients after long duration L-dopa treatment may also be mediated by a dysinhibition of the STN which provokes a decreased activity of the inhibitory globus pallidus and hence, the initiation of choreacthetotic movements and dystonias, ie. dyskinesias.


Indications for surgery: Patients with advanced PD suffering from on-off phenomena, dystonias, dyskinesias, muscular cramps, tremor, etc are suitable for surgery on the posteroventral pallidum. There is an impact profile of pallidal surgery: Dyskinesias respond best, followed by dystonias and muscular cramps, rigidity, tremor, and akinesia, while the so called freezing of the gait is worst in responding.(1) If needed, pallidotomy can be done bilaterally in two separate sessions with a minimum interval of 6 months between the two surgeries. Bilateral pallidotomy is contraindicated if there are significant speech or swallowing problems after the first surgery. The same applies if the patient has moderate memory problems. The risks of bilateral pallidotomies is decreased if the lesions are kept within the posteroventral part of the pallidum, avoiding any encroachment of the lesion on the internal capsule and inclusion of the antero-dorso-medial pallidum in the lesion.(7,13)

Pallidal DBS on the second side of the brain in patients who have already had a pallidotomy on one side may be preferred if the patient has significant speech and voice difficulties.

Side effects: The side effects of pallidotomy in experienced hands are rare and usually transient. a) Pallidotomy in either hemisphere may provoke worsening of memory, injury to optic tract, paresis, depression, stroke, increased salivation. b) Pallidotomy in dominant hemisphere may provoke confusion, dysarthria, dysphonia. c) Pallidal DBS may be complicated by infection, skin erosion, displacement of electrode, seroma in pacemaker pocket, reversible induction of visual, motor, gait and/or speech disturbances.

Results: The results of pallidal surgery depend on which symptoms are being treated. Furthermore, the degree and longevity of improvement of the symptoms, dyskinesias excepted, is quite variable. Dyskinesias decrease markedly in more than 80% of the patients, dystonic pain, muscular cramps and rigidity in about 70%. Tremor decreases significantly in about 65%.(8) Akinesia diminishes slightly or moderately but freezing of the gait generally does not improve. After pallidotomy, “on-off” fluctuations may still occur. However, the “on” periods generally last longer and provide better mobility without dyskinesias, and the “off” periods usually are not as profound and as long-lasting as before surgery. Quality of life is improved.(14) Pallidotomy seems to be more effective, less expensive and less laborious (for patient and doctor) than pallidal DBS. Unlike in other brain targets (see below), DBS in the pallidum has less to offer in terms of increased safety, compared to lesioning, at least when unilateral.

Thalamotomy and Thalamic DBS
Pathophysiological background: The ventralis intermedius (VIM) nucleus and, sometimes, the ventralis oralis posterior (VOP) (and part of the ventralis oralis anterior) nuclei in the ventrolateral thalamus are the main target area for alleviation of tremor. These nuclei occupy an area where dentate-thalamic VIM and pallido-thalamic VOP-VOA pathways converge. These pathways constitute the two adjacent pathways of the so called extra-pyramidal system: one pathway involves a loop connecting the following: cerebellar cortex – dentate – nucleus rubber – ventral thalamus – cerebral cortex - internal capsule – pons nuclei – cerebellar cortex; the other pathway involves a loop between the caudate – putamen – pallidum – ventral thalamus – motor cortex – caudate. In the VIM nucleus, kinaesthetic cells that respond to joint movements and so called tremor cells synchronous with the tremor are present which are believed to act as a “pacemaker” to tremor oscillations.

Indications for surgery: The only indication for surgery on the ventrolateral thalamus is tremor, regardless of origin. Parkinsonian and essential tremor respond best. Rest and postural tremor respond better than action tremor. Distal arm tremor responds better than the proximal one and upper extremity tremor better than lower extremity tremor. Head and axial tremor respond least and so also ataxia and choreoathetotic movements and dystonias. Thalamotomy should not be done on both sides of the brain because of high risks of dysarthria and balance problems. Thalamic DBS is safer and may be chosen for the dominant brain while thalamotomy should be reserved for the non-dominant brain.(15) Bilateral thalamic DBS, however, is also considered quite safe, and has been increasingly used in the last decade. Thalamotomy on the other hand is nowadays more rarely done.

Side effects: Thalamotomy does harbour more risks and provokes more side effects than pallidotomy. Some of the side effects are generally transient.

a) Thalamotomy in either hemisphere may provoke hyptonia, balance problems, hemi-inattention, dyspraxia, paresis,    dysphonia, dysphagia, increased bradykinesia, sensory deficit.
b) Thalamotomy in dominant hemisphere may provoke confusion, memory deficit, dysarthria, dysphonia
c) Thalamic DBS may result in the same complications as for pallidal DBS. However, in the thalamus there may also    be risk for reversible induction of sensory, motor, gait, speech disturbances, ataxia or aggravation of akinesia.

Results: a) Thalamotomy provides in 75-85% of the cases good to excellent results for the tremors. Rigidity is frequently replaced by hypotonia, that may affect the gait negatively b) Thalamic DBS has the same figures as above.

DBS of Subthalamic Nucleus (STN)
Pathophysiological background: In Parkinson’s disease, the subthalamic nucleus (STN) exerts a strong glutaminergic excitatory effect on the GPI increasing thus the inhibitory effect of the GPI on movements. Therefore, the STN is a “logical” target to functionally neutralise (by chronic high frequency stimulation) in order to alleviate the akinesia including the freezing of gait in PD.

Indications for surgery: Patients with mainly akinetic symptoms, and also patients who have motor fluctuations, may benefit from bilateral simultaneous STN DBS. The STN should not be lesioned by radiofrequency coagulation because of risk for severe side effects, especially hemiballism and hypophonia. Therefore, only chronic stimulation with permanently implanted electrodes is advisable. DBS of the STN is a relatively recent procedure. Its long-term efficacy is not yet established nor its safety in terms of remote side effects, despite the fact that it is widely used nowadays. In the following will be listed what is already known about that surgery.

Side effects: Confusion, mostly transient, is frequently seen after bilateral STN DBS.(11) Also dysphonia and dysarthria may not be as uncommon as previously thought. Difficulties in opening eyelids, personality changes and thought disorders have also been mentioned (Volkmann J: Deep brain stimulation of globus pallidus internus and sub-thalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Presentation of the results of the multicenter DBS in advanced Parkinson’s disease study at the Kinetra Launch meeting, Lausanne, Switzerland, February 4, 2000). The possible induction of dyskinesias, it not truly a side effect because after successful STN stimulation, the doses of L-dopa medication can often be reduced in most patients.(11)

Results: So far, it seems, that STN DBS benefits mostly for the akinetic patients, especially patients with gait freezing. In fact, it seems that this is the most powerful surgical procedure for genuine symptoms of PD, including the gait freezing, and it also affects positively the rigidity and the tremor as well.

Conclusion

Stereotactic surgery for Parkinson’s disease is, in experienced hands, a relatively safe operation. Surgery should be proposed for patients well before they reach end-stage of the disease and/or start to show signs of dementia. This would provide the patients with many years of improved quality of life despite the course of their chronic and progressive illness.

The choice of brain target to be lesioned or stimulated should be based on the analysis of the evolution of the specific symptoms of each patient and based on which impact these symptoms have on the disability of the patient. For patients with advanced PD, pallidotomy or STN DBS seems most appropriate. However, depending on bilaterally of symptoms, on availability of stimulators, on costs, and on availability of close follow-up of patients, one may choose between these two procedures, keeping in mind that pallidotomy is often done unilaterally and affects immediately, mainly but not solely, dyskinesias, while STN DBS can be done simultaneously bilateral and acts mainly on gait freezing and rigidity, but requires frequent and laborious follow-up before it reaches its full effect. In those (rare) patients with stable PD and where the tremor is the only symptom, or in patients where a previous pallidal (or STN) surgery did not affect the tremor, then radio-frequency lesion, or, rather, DBS in the ventro lateral thalamus may be indicated. Table 1 shows the characteristics, effects and side effect of the various procedures.

Table1 - Characteristics, effects and side effects of various surgical procedures in advanced Parkinson’s disease
VIM Thalamotomy Pallidotomy VIM DBS Pallidal DBS STN DBS
Bilateral Surgery
Hazardous, even if staged
Possible if staged
Possible, simultaneous
Possible, simultaneous
Necessary simultaneous
Tremor
Very good
Fairly good
Very good
Fairly good

Good

 

Dyskinesias
Fairly good (if Vop included)
Very good
No effect
Very good
Potentially good
Rigidity
good” (hypotonia!)
Very good
No effect
Very good
Very good
Akinesia
No effect or worse
Moderate effect
No effect
Moderate effect
Good effect
Gait
Tilting common
“freezing” seldom better
No effect
“freezing” seldom better
“freezing” improves
Balance
May worsen
Unchanged or improved
May worsen (if bilateral)
Unchanged or improved
Unchanged or improved
Pain/dystonia
Slight effect?
Very good effect
No effect
Very good effect
Moderate effect
Duration of effect
Tremor effect longlasting
Some effects decline
Tolerance/tremor rebound
Some effects decline
Probably long lasting?
Need for medication
Unchanged
Unchanged or increased
Unchanged
Unchanged or increased
Usually decreased
Dysarthria
Slight risk (if dominant)
Moderate risk if bilateral
Moderate risk if bilateral
Moderate risk if bilateral
Slight risk
Hypophonia
Rare (when unilateral)
Moderate risk if bilateral
Rare
Moderate risk if bilateral
Moderate risk
Dysphasia
Rare (when unilateral)
Negligible, even if bilateral
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Sensibility
Risk of dysaesthesia
No risk
Usually No
Usually no
Slight risk
Vision
No risk
Negligible risk for scotoma
No risk
No risk
Risk for blepharospasm
Worsening of cognition Usually no Usually no Usually no Usually no Slight risk
Personality disorder Uncommon Uncommon Uncommon Uncommon Not uncommon
General condition Fatigue not uncommon Fatigue uncommon Fatigue not uncommon Fatigue uncommon Confusion not unusual
Reversibility of side effect Usually no Usually no Usually yes Usually yes Not always!
Disability/Quality of life Uncertain improvement Usually improved Uncertain improvement Usually improved Usually improved

Opinion Summary Monosymptomatic, obsolete? Non-expensive, only unilateral Multisymptomatic, safe, very well documented, non-expensive Monosymptomatic, safe, well documented, risk for tolerance and for rebound of tremor Doubtful indication, high workload, very expensive, safe Very effective, high workload, very expensive, quite safe needs more documentation

Possible combinations of surgical procedures May be combined with ipsilateral and/or contralateral pallidotomy or pallidal DBS – or contralateral Vim DBS or bilateral STN DBS May be combined with contralateral pallidotomy or pallidal DBS, or ipsi/contralateral thalamotomy or ipsi/contralateral Vim DBS or bilateral STN DBS May be combined with contralateral thalamotomy or Vim DBS or contra/ipsilateral pallidotomy or pallidal DBS or bilateral STN DBS May be combined with contralateral pallidotomy or pallidal DBS, or ipsi/contralateral thalamotomy or ipsi/contralateral Vim DBS or bilateral STN DBS May be combined with bilateral (staged) pallidotomy or bilateral pallidal DBS or bilateral Vim DBS or unilateral Vim thalamotomy

Abbreviations: VIM: ventral intermedius nucleus of thalamus. DBS: deep brain stimulation: STN: subthalamic nucleus. VOP: ventral oral posterior nucleus of thalamus

Finally, the surgical technique must rely on physiological exploration of the anatomical target. In most instances, a proper stereotactic radiological imaging of the target area, together with impedance recording and careful experienced macrostimulation should be enough to verify the physiological target at surgery. Intraoperative microelectrode techniques, using single cell microrecording and microstimulation have been advocated for PD surgery.(16) This technique is certainly interesting from a scientific point of view, but it may harbour higher risks for severe morbidity and mortality as shown in various reports.(2,5,6) Besides, the literature so far does not provide evidence that microelectrode techniques increase accuracy of lesion or DBS placement compared to macroelectrode techniques.(4,6) In any case, the surgical procedure used should remain the responsibility of the neurosurgeon who needs to be confident personally in the intraoperative physiological techniques used during PD surgery.

Acknowledgement: We thank Mrs. Merle Melvill, Cape Town, South Africa, for help with the layout of Table 1

   REFERENCES
1. Baron MS, Vitek JL, Bakay RA, Green J, McDonald WM, Cole SA, DeLong MR: Treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease by unilateral posterior Gpi pallidotomy: 4-year results of a pilot study. Mov Disord, 15: 230-237
2. Carrol CB, Scott R, Davies LE, Aziz T: The pallidotomy debate. BJN 1998, 12: 146-150
3. de Bie RM, de Haan RJ, Nijssen PC, Rutgers AW, Beute GN, Bosch DA, Haxma R, Schmand B, Schuurman PR, Staal MJ, Speelman JD: Unilateral pallidotomy in Parkinson’s disease: A randomised, single-blind, multicentre trial. Lancet 1999, 354: 1665-1669
4. Hallett M, Litban I: Evaluation of surgery for Parkinson’s disease: A report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. The Task Forces on Surgery for Parkinson’s Disease. Neurol 1999, 53: 1910-1921
5. Hariz MI, Bergenheim AT, Fodstad H: Crusade for micoelectrode guidance in pallidotomy. Letter to the Editor. J Neurosurg 1999, 90: 175-177
6. Hariz MI, Fodstad H: Do microelectrode techniques increase accuracy or decrease risks in pallidotomy and deep brain stimulation? A critical review of the literature. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999, 72: 157-169
7. Hariz MI: Complications of movement disorder surgery and how to avoid them. In: Lozano A: Progress in Neurological Surgery, Vol 15, Basel, Karger 2000, pp 246-265
8. Johansson F, Malm J, Nordh E, Hariz M: Usefulness of pallidotomy in advanced Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 1997, 62: 125-132
9. Krack P, Hamel W, Mehdorn HM, Deuschl G: Surgical treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Curr Opin Neurol 1999, 12: 417-425
10. Laitinen LV, Bergenheim AT, Hariz MI: Leksell’s posteroventral pallidotomy in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosurg 1992, 76: 53-61
11. Limousin P, Krack P, Pollak P, Benazzouz A, Ardouin C, Hoffmann D, Benabid AL: Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease. New Eng J Med 1998, 339: 1105-1111
12. Limousin-Dowsey P, Pollak P, VamBlercom N, Krack P, Benazzouz A, Benabid A: Thalamic, subthalamic nucleus and internal pallidum stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 1999, 246 (Suppl) 2:II: 42-45
13. Lombardi WJ, Gross RE, Trepanier LL, Lang AE, Lozano AM, Saint-Cyr JA: Relationship of lesion location to cognitive outcome following microelectrode-guided pallidotomy for Parkinson’s disease: Support for the existence of cognitive circuits in the human pallidum. Brain 2000, 123: 746-758
14. Martinez-Martin P, Valldeoriola F, Molinuevo JL, Nobbe FA, Rumia J, Tolosa E: Pallidotomy and quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease: An early study. Mov Disord 2000, 15: 65-70
15. Schuurman PR, Bosch DA, Bossuyt PM, Bonsel GJ, van Someren EJ, de Bie RM, Merkus MP, Speelman JD: A comparison of continuous thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for suppression of severe tremor. N Eng J Med 2000, 342: 461-468
16. Vitek JL, Bakay RA, Hashimoto T, Kaneoke Y, Mewes K, Yu Zhang J, Rye D, Starr P, Baron M, Turner R, Delong MR: Microelectrode-guided pallidotomy: technical approach and its application in medically intractable Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosurg 1998, 88: 1027-1043

 


HOME | UP | FEEDBACK
Historical Notes | Executive Committee| Regional Societies and Links | Forthcoming Meetings
Bylaws | Journal | News and Letters

http://www.panarabneurosurgery.org/
Copyright 2001